FWO files special leave application in Marland Mushrooms case
NOTE: On 14 February 2020, the High Court refused the Fair Work Ombudsman’s special leave application. In June 2020, the Federal Court imposed a penalty against Ms Tao Hu. Further information is available at: Penalty for underpayment of mushroom farm workers.
19 September 2019
On 13 September 2019, the Fair Work Ombudsman filed an application in the High Court of Australia seeking special leave to appeal against the split decision of the Full Federal Court in Fair Work Ombudsman v Hu  FCAFC 133.
The matter concerns the operation of the pieceworker provisions in the Horticulture Award 2010, as well as accessorial liability under section 550 of the Fair Work Act 2009 for underpayments to pieceworkers.
In September 2016, the Fair Work Ombudsman commenced proceedings in the Federal Court of Australia regarding alleged underpayments of nearly $650,000 to 386 casual mushroom pickers employed by HRS Country Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (HRS).
The employees picked mushrooms at a farm operated by Marland Mushrooms Qld Pty Ltd (Marland Mushrooms) and were paid piecework rates.
Following HRS entering liquidation, the Fair Work Ombudsman brought proceedings against HRS’s director, Tao Hu, Marland Mushrooms and its director, Troy Marland, as accessories to the alleged underpayments under section 550 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
In July 2018, the Federal Court issued a judgment that accepted the employees had been underpaid, but rejected some submissions made by the Fair Work Ombudsman in relation to the operation of the pieceworker provisions in the award (including how to calculate underpayments).
The Federal Court also dismissed the Fair Work Ombudsman’s allegations that Marland Mushrooms and Mr Troy Marland were involved as accessories in the underpayments.
The Fair Work Ombudsman appealed the July 2018 judgment and this was the subject of a split decision of the Full Federal Court of Australia on 16 August 2019.
The special leave application seeks to have the High Court consider legal questions regarding how to compensate an employee paid a pieceworker rate if an inadequate rate is paid (e.g. whether they fall back to the minimum hourly rates under the award), and also clarify whether an accessory needs to have knowledge of the legal employment status of an employee (e.g. permanent or casual) to be liable under section 550 of the Fair Work Act 2009.
The Fair Work Ombudsman made the decision to seek special leave to appeal to the High Court due to the public importance and the potential impact this matter has for the protections of vulnerable pieceworkers, as well as significant legal questions regarding accessorial liability.
Follow the Fair Work Ombudsman @fairwork_gov_au or find us on Facebook www.facebook.com/fairwork.gov.au .
Sign up to receive the Fair Work Ombudsman’s media releases direct to your email inbox at www.fairwork.gov.au/mediareleases.
Michael Anderson, Assistant Media Director
Mobile: 0409 120 830
Want to save this information for later?
If you might need to read this information again, save it for later so you can access it quickly and easily.
Page reference No: 9235